Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta ravenclaw. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta ravenclaw. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 1 de febrero de 2022

WHAT IS MY HARDING-PENCROFT HOUSE?

 Harding-Pencroft Academy, a five-year high school that graduates the best marine scientists, naval warriors, navigators, and underwater explorers in the world.

Basically, Hogwarts with an aquatic twist, courtesy of Rick Riordan.



As would be de rigueur, there are four houses in this academy of adventure - and I'm in House ORCA which is right up my alley, as it centers on life and health sciences but also on PSYCHOLOGY and EDUCATION. Not only that, but the most prominent character in Orca in the novel, Ester Harding, is autistic like yours truly (the third verbally autistic major female character so far in mainstream youth fiction, after Entrapta of Dryl and Futaba Sakura)!!!

(PS. This scenario kind of reminds me of Luna Lovegood being a Ravenclaw like yours truly -also an autistic or somehow on-the-spectrum character being on the intellectual house of the four-house academy of adventure...)

jueves, 31 de enero de 2019

a few personal questions about miss dermark on her birthday

Of course I am being HONEST about all these questions -- Sandra Dermark for beginners, you may say, right?
  • Sweets or savouries? - sweets, definitely
  • Straight, queer, ace...? - ace, definitely
  • Early bird or night owl? - definitely the latter. Some holidays I wake up at one pm! I have delayed sleep phase disorder. Some days I wish I were more of a morning person...
  • Hogwarts house? - Ravenclaw, and fiercely proud of it!
  • Faction? - Amity, that's how it is -but I have never been into Divergent outside Amity, to be honest
  • Enneatype? Seven, most surely Sexual Seven with both wings
  • Favourite singer's voice? - Freddie Mercury (male) and Ana Torroja (female)
  • Favourite fairytale characters? - the prince and the princess in the Fourth Story of The Snow Queen
  • Favourite Shakespearean characters? - Cassio from Othello and Portia from The MoV
  • Favourite deities of any mythos? Loki and Uzume (I assume the latter is far less known than all the other characters I have mentioned before, so I'll give you readers the buzz: meet a Japanese lesser goddess who stars in only one myth, the one in which she frees the Sun, but her MO is equal to anything outrageous Loki has ever done -- basically, the Sun personified has had a bad day full of sibling squabbles and sulks in her locked room, eclipsing herself. After a long period of endless dark gloomy winter, the intelligent and adorable and besides plucky perky Uzume, who had been sipping her sake all along, sets her cup aside and has the bright idea of putting a large mirror and a bathtub at the entrance of Miss Sun's locked door, dressing in the scantiest kimono she has -think of those translucent Dornish silks!-, gathering an audience 800 strong out of all the protesters -gods, catfolk, merfolk, snow queens, ogres, you name it- who are gnashing their teeth and/or ranting in front of the Sun's locked room, splashing bath-water on her own dress till it's drenched to make the silk stick to her skin, and performing for this audience risqué songs to a provocative dance that involves striking lots of risqué poses as well as boob jiggle and hip waggle and flirtation with the audience of all species and both genders... all the while taunting the Sun that outside there's a goddess who is garnering lots more of attention -ie Uzume herself-! And the audience echoing her approval and proving that so it is... So: at the crowning point of the performance, the Sun huffs out in a rage (feeling that they have replaced her with someone else), is dazzled on the threshold by her own radiant reflection in the mirror, and they lock the door to the empty room behind her. As the Sun joins in the celebration (I picture her flirting with Uzume, who is still the star du jour), sunlight comes back to the Earth, springtime will soon return and there is much rejoicing. Then Uzume, who rules over sunrises and revelry and entertainment as a reward for her achievements, fades back into the background - but her story, basically a gender-flipped cosmic-horror version of Achilles and Patroclus without the war, has inspired countless episode of anime series! Including one where Uzume is a ferret...).
  • Fetishes? - brightly-coloured period military uniforms, prep school-boarding school uniforms, Victorian porcelain dolls (both girl and boy dolls), the art nouveau aesthetic, males with queues (low ponytails), bifauxnen/otokoyaku/reverse trap anime characters, brightly-coloured frogs (poisonous or not), Scandinavian counterpart cultures...
  • Favourite musicals? - Les Misérables, Beauty & the Beast, Great Comet (and, if operas count, Verdi's Otello and Un Ballo in Maschera)
  • Favourite comedy? Classic British comedy: Monty Python, Black Adder, 'Allo Allo, Eddie Izzard, Fools and Horses, Carry On Up the Khyber, Carry On Jack, Carry On and Don't Lose your Head...
  • A question they have asked you so often that it wearies you? How many languages do you speak?
  • Any flaws you ashame yourself over? Well, being a LOUD TALKER!!! And an attention whore who wants to feel that all eyes are upon her. And unable to wait without distractions, and prone to look before I leap, right? There's also my tendency to drown my sorrows in liquor or in ice cream when I'm feeling down...
  • A guilty pleasure? White chocolate with berries, absinthe, and watching animesque cute-and-psycho perky female minions (most lately, Ty LeeEntrapta, and Paper Star on Netflix on my laptop). Not necessarily all three (ie white chocolate and berries+absinthe+animesque cute and psycho PFMs) at the same time.
  • If you had any supernatural power, what would you pick? Optimism inducement. Sometimes people are too stubborn and/or too stuck in their negative emotions for your own natural merry mood to spread to them - plus, it might not seem like it, but optimism inducement also has its perversion potential... hehe... 
  • Any underlying themes in your fiction? - Relationships, youth, fulfillment, human weakness, altered states... 

 PS. An omedetou to fellow kindred spirits and eccentric Cupbearers in fiction ;)



 Entrapta

 Lloyd Asplund

 And of course Luna Lovegood!


And the Cute and Psycho Rhiannon (and her more responsible minder-twin Tristan)!



And this little essay from a zodiac book that pretty much nails my personality:

31st of January 

- the birthday of the bright spirit


People born on this date have an overwhelming need to be noticed, heard, and taken seriously. And because more often than not these bright, appealing people achieve this goal with ease, they are admired by others for their creativity, vision, and originality. 
Strong willpower, steadfastness, and an emphasis on self-expression define people who are born on this day. They can also be quite progressive, with a touch of genius about them. Although they can appear absent-minded and chaotic at times, this is only because their thoughts are always on fast-forward, their minds filled with original and ingenious ideas and concepts.
When they feel they have made some kind of breakthrough they run the risk of getting overexcited, but others tend to find this endearing rather than annoying. In fact people born on this day are generally well liked for being so inventive and entertaining in their never-ending quest for knowledge. They are magnetic personalities but harbour a tendency to be occasionally oversensitive, reading hidden meanings into the deeds and words of others. When they feel upstaged, put upon, or let down they may overreact and either withdraw completely and become depressed, or startle others with their sharp tongue. They need to learn to be a little less intense in their relationships and to accept that sometimes other people want to share the limelight.
Occasionally people born on this day may feel pressured to conform to others' expectations of them in order to be liked; by so doing they run the risk of losing their unique charm. Fortunately, around the age of twenty there is a turning point which suggests they are able to develop greater self-reliance; at the age of fifty there is another turning point which highlights their fighting spirit and emotional resilience.
Above all, people born on the 31st of January are bright spirits who have the ability to light up the world with their bubbly personalities and brilliance. Once they learn to truly value themselves they have the potential not only to bring great happiness to the world but also to influence and inspire.

Your greatest challenge is to stop losing interest quickly if others don't give you their heartfelt support.
The way forward is... not to try something else but to trust your instincts and make your own decisions about what is or is not right for you.

On the dark side

Uncertain, suspicious, grovelling

At your best

Appealing, original, strong




viernes, 24 de marzo de 2017

SCHEIN UND SEIN / OMOTE TO URA

In Phantásien wird nämlich nicht unterschieden zwischen Gut und Böse: Alle Wesen sind gleich wichtig. Führt man sich Endes poetisches Konzept vor Augen, wird verständlich, warum das so ist: Kunst ist wie ein Traum. Sie belehrt nicht, sondern stellt dar. Was wäre Shakespeares Othello ohne Jago, was Macbeth ohne die böse Lady? Träume kann man nicht moralisch werten. Die Darstellung des Bösen ist nicht böse, die des Heiligen nicht heilig.

Sometimes cross-cultural notions existing across Eurasia can further us in our understanding of Shakespeare. Let's take the case of Schein vs. Sein (appearance vs. reality) in German and the corresponding omote (literally, "obverse") vs. ura (literally, "reverse") in Japanese, for instance. Schein/omote refers to the image of the self that the public gets to see, the façade, the face one shows to the world, how one wants to be regarded and remembered; while Sein/ura is the true self, including secrets, flaws, bad habits, the dark side... that only friends, relatives, and significant others get to know (aside from the self). Both dichotomies refer, long story short, to the public image as opposed to the private image of a person. For the Japanese still to our days, and early modern Westerners as well, a lot of time is spent on differentiating these two aspects of life.

Well we all have a face
that we hide away forever,
and we take them out and show ourselves
when everyone has gone...
Some are satin, some are steel,
some are silk and some are leather;
they're the faces of the stranger,
but we love to try them on...


Well, we all fall in love,
but we disregard the danger:
Though we share so many secrets,
there are some we never tell...
Why were you so surprised
that you never saw the stranger?
Did you ever let your lover see
the stranger in yourself?


You may never understand
how the stranger is inspired,
but he isn't always evil
and he isn't always wrong...
Though you drown in good intentions,
you will never quench the fire:
You'll give in to your desire
when the stranger comes along.

(PS. "omote/ura" can literally mean "obverse/reverse", "heads/tails" [of a coin], "Earth side/dark side" [of the Moon] but this is about their metaphorical meaning.)
As an Asperger and obsessive whose closet of flaws is always shut and who looks like a plain vanilla muggle right off the bat (no muteness or echolalia, no sunglasses or seeing-eye dogs, no wheelchair...) I am concerned, unusually for a Continental Western European of the present day, about this Schein/Sein or omote/ura dichotomy. Few know about my pet peeves (things like my convictions that the week should always begin on Monday and the decimal metric system is the right one, for instance), compulsive rituals to exorcise my obsessions, phobias... So I have created a second, virtual omote/Schein which I use to rant and rave at aspects of the Anglo worldview I dislike when I am not squeeing over things I completely adore. Yes, that third self of mine is Miss Dermark the blogmistress.
Now this dichotomy is one of the vertebral axes of Othello, as expected of a play dealing with identity and the loss thereof. The story has every character but Iago (we'll return to Iago soon, since his true self is the puzzle to end all Shakespearean puzzles) is wearing a cracked mask and what we witness is their Sein, their ura, seeping through that fissure out into the light as the mask shatters. We humans are all wearing such cracked masks and are extremely concerned, Europeans or Asians, even in our days, abou their possible shattering.
-- Yes, indeed, and Othello always provokes a lot of interesting commentary.--
--Things go wrong, though, on the night of the celebration of the dispersal of the Turkish fleet. Cassio gets drunk. Iago, acting through the agency of Roderigo, manages to embroil Cassio in a fight. As a result of which, he's cashiered. He loses his position. Othello, who appears to be in the middle of consummating his marriage, is brought from his bed and has to break up the fight. "Why, how now, ho!" he says, "From whence ariseth this? Are we turn'd Turks, and to ourselves do that which heaven hath forbid the Ottomites?" Are we turned Turks?--
--The brilliantly sophisticated thing about the play, a sophistication, perhaps, akin to that of this work of art, is that nothing is quite as you expected.
You can look at this dish one way and the flowers appear to be in the shape of a heart, Look at them another way, and they don't. It repays endless attention. That's what a great work of art always does. So too with Othello. Look at it one way and it looks as though the threat is of the Turk, but look at it another way, and you see that the threat comes from within. In the end, what brings about the tragedy Othello's downfall, his barbarism, is not some outside force, some other culture, some alien, but Iago, the (ostensibly) super-sophisticated.--
It's no surprise that "ura" itself in Japanese is the lexis, the verbal root, of "uragiru", to betray. Or of "urabanashi", gossip/inside story; or "uragane", what we call bribing or "dirty/black/blood money." To be ironic is "ura no iu". The reverse side in Japanese has the same connotations as the left in the West, while the obverse, like the right in our culture, is laden with prestige. Consider "omote datsu", to become public; "omote-muki", public or formal; "omote wo tateru", putting up a front; "omote wo tsukurou", keeping up appearances; "omote wo haru," keeping up a façade; and "omote kanban", figurehead.
We'll refer also a lot to two concepts in particular. One of them is "ura wo kaku", to counterplot/outwit. (Kaku means angle or corner) And the other is "ura-omote", which can read either to mean "inside out" or "two-faced person." A title which can actually apply to Iago as well. Is he trolling the whole Cypriot officer class? Or is he scheming for revenge? Or is he gay and his motivation is unrequited love? Or something completely different altogether? That's the Rubik's Cube of this tragedy. Being obviously a cube, or hexahedron, the puzzle created by Rubik Ernõ (in Eastern name order; in Western order, given name first, it would be Ernõ Rubik) has got no proper obverse and reverse: something has to be two-sided for these concepts to apply.
Basically, everyone in Othello but Iago is a playing card, a hidden playing card in poker or maybe in a tarot spread. While Iago himself is a Rubik's Cube with a lot of different facets --six facets, one per every other character-- and a riddle so difficult to crack that oodles of problem-solvers have each and every one given their own version.
Right now, RIGHT NOW, I am thinking about the Korsvägen station in Gothenburg one afternoon, while waiting for the tram to come. A young man who looked neither too Scandinavian nor too Mediterranean was solving and unsolving a Rubik's Cube on the station by my side, the whole puzzle of many riddles or riddle of many puzzles constantly at his fingertips, no matter how convoluted.
But most of us lack the skill that both puzzle cube solvers and psychopaths, AKA Iagos, have a reason to impress us with. I, the foreign girl from the provinces, meant to return home when autumn came, was the Hamilton to his Burr, but also the Cassio to his Iago in a certain sense. Maybe what I know about classical literature and epic fantasy and anime was beyond his reach. That geek side of me is, in another sense, my ura, my reverse side, only known to family and fellow geek friends; it caused my ostracism as an awkward secondary and high school girl. Right now I am wearing a Ravenclaw scarf as I type these lines. That's a real heart-on-sleeve gesture of flipping identity, or omote-ura, that Iago will not dare for fears that carrion crows should peck his heart out. Every single Othello character but Iago gets their own omote-ura moment --after all, the pitch black core of a Rubik's Cube, unlike its six colourful faces, is meant never to be seen--. And all of them come more or less as identity crises. It's more like being laughed at by others for wearing a Ravenclaw scarf, be it for the sake of being a Potterhead or for being not a Gryff or Slyth. Iago never wears his heart upon his sleeves, but he tears up the chest of everyone else to expose their hearts, their obverse selves. And for that he cleverly employs malicious gossip or urabanashi --a photo of me with that Ravenclaw scarf on taken by one of the highschool vipers if she had recognized me this evening, and shared among her posse of friends on WhatsApp or a social network group, would do exactly the same harm as that strawberry handkerchief and the drunken brawl that came before it.


Well we all have a face
that we hide away forever,
and we take them out and show ourselves
when everyone has gone...
Some are satin, some are steel,
some are silk and some are leather;
they're the faces of the stranger,
but we love to try them on...



Arrigo Boito sums up the many faces of Iago in his characterisation notes for the Verdian opera:
He must be handsome and appear genial and open and falsely bonhomous; everyone believes him to be honest except his wife who knows him well. If he did not possess great charm and an appearance of honesty he could not be the consummate deceiver that he is.
One of his talents is the faculty he possessses of changing his personality according to the person to whom he happens to be speaking, so as to deceive them or to bend them to his will.
Easy and genial with Cassio; ironic with Roderigo; apparently good-humoured, respectful and humbly devoted towards Othello; brutal and threatening with Emilia; obsequious to Desdemona. Such are the basic qualities, the appearance and the various facets of this man.
Just stop and consider how everyone's Sein comes to light, their masks shatter, and their hearts are displayed in the light of day, throbbing, bloody, when their respective ribcages are metaphorically torn up!

Well, we all fall in love,
but we disregard the danger:
Though we share so many secrets,
there are some we never tell...
Why were you so surprised
that you never saw the stranger?
Did you ever let your lover see
the stranger in yourself?

The friendzoned and brokenhearted suitor who just won't give up is lured to pay his fortune, in so-called uragane or Judas money, in exchange for what he believes is self-confidence, staying equally awkward and equally desperate at heart, which makes him doubt the schemer at the end of the day.
The dashing, charming lieutenant gets persuaded to drink on duty and starts a brawl under the influence, which causes his fall from grace. He therefore doubts he can be reinstated if he tries on his own at the startover of his career. And, in involving his lady friend, it all snowballs into the end of his career and those he loves... said friend and his commanding officer role model, in spite of the fact that said CO has finally forgiven his initial offense. All of this for a drink more before the changing of the guard!
The happily married kind-hearted young lady tries to bridge the gap between her husband and her friend, only to realise that she is accused by the former of having an affair with the latter, suffering marital abuse and ultimately dying young and violently at the hands of her own spouse, while honestly defending the truth and her own purity and sincerity.
The lieutenant's fiancée, whom he basically friendzones out of fear of commitment, snaps out of the suspicion that he's found his equal in a girl of his own standing. Fortunately, she doesn't take it as far as the general does, being used to his ways and her heart staying intact.
The young lady's husband, a confident general of fortune madly in love with her and with another raison d'être than warfare since he met her, snaps even more dreadfully out of the suspicion that she's found her equal in a man of her own standing. It leads his wartime trauma to resurface when his heart breaks, turning him into an insane Untermensch or beast that relishes abuse and even kills his former beloved "for love" and for her to break no more hearts... and who subsequently commits ritual suicide upon realising the truth and coming to grips with the shock of reality.
The schemer's own wife is used to putting up a brave face, to dissociate her own omote and ura, due to her spouse's mistreatment... but her lady's suffering, mirroring her own in a younger and more innocent victim that is far more fragile, makes her convictions waver. It takes losing Desdemona for good to make her turn the corner, that "kaku" mentioned above, on the schemer by tearing out a few squares of Iago's Cube, as I once did as a preteen kid to my own Rubik just because I was curious and in the dissecting phase of my life: whether live large bugs and frogs, and lizards... speaking dolls, stuffed animals, or simple devices like a Rubik's Cube, I was always curious to see what it was like inside. And, to be earnest, the core of the Cube looked and still looks pretty anti-aesthetic to me.
If Pink Floyd had named their CD Earth Side of the Moon, it wouldn't have the same ring to it --and neither would it fit the iconic prism-rainbow sleeve that we all know and adore. In my sci-fi uchronia retelling of the Satomi Hakkenden (a story in whose original Japanese hypotext Kakutaro or Daikaku --one of the eight chosen ones-- is, like Othello, tricked by mistake into doubting his young wife's faithfulness), the Nazis do not settle exactly on the Earth side of the Moon either. The dark side is the one that fascinates us.
Back to the "kaku", the corner. It's the hinge, the turning point, where it's NEITHER obverse NOR reverse. The German has no third liminal stage between Schein and Sein, while the Japanese has omote-kaku-ura. A playing card or a coin has a kaku in the form of the edge, while a spherical object like the Moon ostensibly lacks a kaku --unless in its half phase, when it shows fifty-fifty equal proportions of dark and Earth side. But still it's an illusion. As illusive --illusory and elusive-- as Iago's true catalyst.

You may never understand
how the stranger is inspired,
but he isn't always evil
and he isn't always wrong...
Though you drown in good intentions,
you will never quench the fire:
You'll give in to your desire
when the stranger comes along.

lunes, 14 de marzo de 2016

FRODO IN UMBRIDGE'S OFFICE

This fic does not belong to me, but still I felt that I had to share it with u:

46.) Justice
Word Count: 442
Frodo sat in Dolores Umbridge’s office. His reason for being there: causing a disruption in class. Yes, he was a hobbit wizard and with that came specific obligations. This was one of those times. And he would make sure she would leave Hogwarts.
“Miss Umbridge, what time is it?” Frodo asked, curious.
“Seven-thirty. Why do you ask?” Umbridge asked in return.
He shrugged. “I was curious.” He paused. “Miss Umbridge, are you the greatest witch at Hogwarts?”
“Is that a compliment? You’re in detention, Mr. Baggins.”
“I know, but it’s nice to be at your mercy.” He said, growing excited. “Miss Umbridge, what do you call a cat that chases mice?”
“Now Mr. Baggins, a cat is very stealthy and…”
“A louse!” He gaped at her in delight.
“A louse is an insect. It is not a cat or a mouse.”
“But a louse is better than a cat.”
“Cats are very stealthy creatures. They attack louses with pride, similar to what I am doing for your detention,” she said. Frodo peered at the black quill in derision.
“Miss Umbridge, do you know the difference between a dog and a cat?”
“Of course I do, boy. A dog chases the cat, but the bigger cat attacks the dog. That’s why cats are a vital importance at Hogwarts,” she smiled cheerfully. It was that smile that set Frodo’s teeth on edge. The way Umbridge was taking pride in cats drove him mad.
“Miss Umbridge, what’s the difference between a dog and a frog?”
“Mr. Baggins, I am obliged to answer all your questions about animals, but we really need to focus on your…”
“Miss Umbridge, what’s the difference between a step-stool and a normal-sized stool?” He asked in excitement. He paused. The silence was foreboding. “Well, what is it?”
“Mr. Baggins, you will write with this quill and…” she was cut off by Frodo, who had more questions to ask her:
“Miss Umbridge, why won’t you answer my questions? All Ravenclaws know the difference between a step-stool and a step-ladder.” His eyes beamed in rays of happiness.
“What is the point of these questions, Baggins?!” She stopped him from further asking questions. “That’s enough! I will not tolerate this nonsense a moment longer. I am off to see Dumbledore and punish you further for your insubordination.” She charged out the door without another word. He was pleased, but wondered if she would grant him more detentions…
As it happened, Frodo was released from further detentions. He met up with Fred and George Weasley in the Great Hall. They were excited when he explained his little test with Umbridge. It was a good day.

lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2015

REELING AND WRITHING VII: CHARACTER CHEMISTRY

REELING AND WRITHING
or,
Miss Dermark's 2015 Advent Calendar

DAY SEVEN

CHARACTER CHEMISTRY
or,
THE ZODIAC, THE ENNEAGRAM, AYURVEDA: CUES FOR PERSONALITIES.

Q: What are you, Sandra?
A: A girl, a (university) student, a twenty-something, a daughter, a granddaughter, an only child, a closeted nerd, an aesthete, a half-Swede half-Spaniard, a lefty, an aspie...
Q: We all know all that jazz. We're referring to your personality...
A: Ok. I'm an ENFP, an Aquarius ascendant Virgo, a Seven with a Six wing, a Mercurial, a Ravenclaw... Satisfied?

In my translation from the Swedish of an essay by Sven Tito Achen, I wrote the following:
"But there's still another satisfying effect in zodiacal images, id est, the identification they offer us.
One of the duties of zodiac signs is to represent or characterize the people born under the sign in question. Since we are all born under one of them, it means that the zodiac gives every individual a pictorial identity, a psychological and pictorial idea of belonging -- if one prefers: a crest, sigil, or coat of arms. Or a totem. Why this is so relevant can be hard to explain, but the fact that it is so cannot be doubted by seeing zodiac signs at least one hundred times a day, in necklaces, bracelets, and rings, as motorbike stickers and bumper stickers."
Get it? We seek affinity. We know there's a label we can fit into, like Seven (in the Enneagram), Amity, Aquarius, Ravenclaw, House Nymeros Martell, ENFP, Mercurial personality (to give my own labels)... It gives us the sense that we are not alone, and there are more people like us out there.
And how do we tie this into character creation?

I often use the enneagram and the zodiac to create my characters in my longer fictional 'verses (the zodiac, simply stating that a person's birthday determines that person's character, may not fit: you may have a calm and logical Aries... but s/he is a One, and/or with an earth ascendant: that explains a lot. The enneagram, on the other hand, is far more true to the idea of personality evolving as a strategy to deal with a hostile world. Thus, Ones try to put order, Twos try to help others, Threes try to project a positive image of themselves...). And ayurveda, sometimes, for their physical make-up (it also includes emotional and mental features as well). There are pure doshas and dosha combinations. I am a pitta-vata, combining pitta traits (greasy skin and scalp, fair hair and skin, freckles, a short fuse, a mesomorph physique...) inherited from my Swedish father with vata traits (restlessness, sensitivity to the cold, erratic sleeping and eating habits, creativity, constipation...) inherited from my Spanish-Cuban-French-Basque mother.
We're Aquariuses all three, though with different ascendants (Sten [Aquarius-Sagittarius] + Elena [Aquarius-Aquarius] = Sandra [Aquarius-Virgo]). And, going one generation up, you'll find, aside from the Basque and the French surnames, 3 air signs to 1 earth sign: my currently only living grandmother, Barbro Dermark, née Rydskog (a Virgo). Here is the whole table of descent, detailing star signs, profession, and nationality/descent:
(Lars [Gemini, businessman, Swedish] + Barbro [Virgo, student/homemaker, Swedish] = Sten [Aquarius, businessman, Swedish].)
(José [Libra, scientist, Cuban Ibizan/Cuban Basque] + Ana [Gemini, teacher, Cuban French/Cuban Castilian] = Elena [Aquarius, private tutor, Spanish Cuban].)
(Sten [Aquarius, businessman, Swedish] + Elena [Aquarius, private tutor, Spanish Cuban] = Sandra [Aquarius, university student, Spanish].)
So I looked at the facts and thought... are star signs inherited? Looking at royal families of the early modern period, and at the relatives of my few friends, let me see that star signs can be inherited. In the Ringstetten Saga, the first male lead Gerhard is an Aquarius (like me), his wife Liselotte being a Virgo (for my ascendant). These star signs, aside from air and earth signs in general, reoccur through the dynasty, the flow of new blood into the dynasty bringing new zodiacal combinations. Liselotte's birth father, Gustavus Adolphus, was a Sagittarius, so fire signs are yet another constant in the Ringstetten bloodline. As relevant are winter-born children, including Sags (in spite of Sagittarius not being a sign of winter proper, since it covers late November and early December): every eldest child of the Ringstetten household is born in winter (or, more properly, late autumn with lots of snow, if it's a Sag).
Gerhard Wilhelm von Ringstetten is an Aquarius but he's also a Six, as seen in his interactions with authority throughout his character arc. What's more, he's a rare kind of Six with both the "phobic" Five wing and the "counterphobic" Seven wing. Sometimes exceedingly obedient, perfectly abiding by the "by-the-book young lieutenant" stereotype his character was meant to deconstruct... and sometimes exceedingly defiant, as seen especially when it takes to his relationship with strong drink and in his sheer recklessness on the battlefield. Basically, I took Cassio from Othello (the centuries-old "by-the-book young lieutenant" prototype), found out he was a Six with both wings, and started from there. What would this character be like if he ever had real military experience? From there and from my passion from the 30YW sprung the whole Ringstetten series. The combination of his zodiac sign (the most open-minded air sign of them all), family backstory, and desires basically wrote the character's enneatype as well. No surprise that he is exceedingly embarrassed of his middle name (given after the ruling Elector of Brandenburg-Prussia).

In my latest project, Pleasure Past and Anguish Past, the leading characters are childhood friends Catherine Saunier (a Virgo, a Seven 6w) and Étienne Lebrun (an Aquarius, a Six both wings), both of them French hinterland middle-class young adults heading for university... Their doshas, pitta and vata respectively, can be seen through their physique: he is dark-haired, tall and lean, with blue eyes and a reserved attitude; she is freckled and titian-haired (golden-haired in her childhood), honey-eyed and with a significant cup size, that at first embarrasses her.
Also: Important character Friedl Schönherr is given a significant development: Friedl at first appears to be male, to have the semblance of "one of the ephebes loved by Apollo: golden hair as bright as those green eyes, soft narrow shoulders, skin like mother-of-pearl and delicate features... spoke with an Austrian accent, a Schönbrunn dialect to be more precise, in a lovely tenor voice." Yet Friedl is revealed to be female, putting on men's clothing and looking smart/sharp, assuming a male identity, and bisexual. Her real name, Friederike, embarrasses her even more than Lieutenant von Ringstetten is of being Gerhard Wilhelm. To Friedl, Friederike (their former identity) is dead since long ago: Friedl "killed" Friederike upon leaving her provincial birthplace of Linz for Vienna, as she left her rightish parents, devoutly Catholic as any other good wealthy hinterland Austrians, who tried to live their daughter's life and turn her into a proper lady against her will. (Friedl Schönherr still says Hildegard and Rainer von Lieberecht were the brains behind the death of Friederike von Lieberecht...)
Friedl is an Aquarius with a Leo ascendant, while her partner Renée (a Parisian M2F transsexual) is a Gemini with an Aries ascendant: both of them air signs with fire ascendants. Like the prince and princess of The Snow Queen, on whom they are based (Friedl on the princess and Renée on the prince, though the first impression fools us just like it fools Cath and Tellagorri), they are kindred spirits and meant for each other: "he is as pleased with her as she is with him." Renée as well is also described in a way that makes both Catherine and her mentor, Jon Tellagorri, assume they (Renée is non-binary) are female at the first impression: "unruly raven curls sprawled all over the bedsheets like the rays of a black star... limbs pearly white and delicate, Renée slept with slender arms raised upwards... like an Art Nouveau muse, or more like a vampire countess in a scarlet lace négligée..."
Many other people in their secret circle of Prague society are deviants from traditional gender roles, Italian lolita-themed transvestite Luca, a pure Gemini, who becomes a counterpart and a lover to Tellagorri, among them. Like Friedl, Luca also fled a religious, conservative, and provincial family (his, with a Catholic priestly tradition, in Trento) and "killed" his old self to try her luck, with a new identity, elsewhere. Most relevantly, all three of these characters are Sevens, though Friedl could be an Eight with a Seven wing as well. The interesting thing is how, while two of them hail from ultra-rightish backgrounds with clear religious morality and societal expectations, Renée was born and raised in a lower-middle-class artistic environment in Montmartre, with far more lax norms and little to no constraints/limits. Proof that the same personality type can be in the blood and can occur across far different backgrounds/family structures, or that it can be a consequence of the style of both lenient and harsh caregivers.
Irina Alekseievna Larina, the robber maiden character, is a Sagittarius with Scorpio ascendant (as seen by her cool, mysterious, reserved, introverted yet attractive appearance [she is a soldier of fortune and a military brat, aside from dark-haired and hazel-eyed, rarely smiling or laughing at first] and, later on, by her real-life enthusiasm values of idealism, adventure, self-discovery...). And an Eight, a true tough and prickly chestnut with a soft center, as Catherine winds up calling her. Taking over the late Tellagorri's mentor role, her relationship with Cath is an explosive one, eschewing the usual "Thelma and Louise" plot (the two girls trek across the Baltic and across Sweden in the flowered Vespa, pursued by both her military unit/guardians and the villainess's henchmen hot on their heels). It isn't until Irina appears that the mentoring phase of the story ends and things get gradually more and more exciting...

In my oldest project, The Stars' Tears, I have three characters, male, female, and non-binary, born each one under one of the air signs, with different origins and different, contrasting enneatypes. István Esterházy is a One and an Aquarius (aside from a septuagenarian in a young adult's body), tall, dark, and slender, made to resemble Final Fantasy VIII character Irvine Kinneas, but with a reserved and disciplined personality radically opposite from Irvine's. Kareena "Reena" Isadora Violet Desdemona Fitzwilliam XIV is a Libra and a Four, looking like a platinum blond and violet-eyed, beautiful Targaryen, but actually modelled upon pop star Utau Hoshina-Tsukiyomi, the dark magical girl in Shugo Chara, whose personality she shares, though Reena is far more angsty and even masochistic, reaching lengths Utau would never attain. Asuka Akizuki, a Gemini and a Seven, is the most original character of the series, not only for being non-binary (though born female), but also because of their whimsical and eccentric choices of attire and emotional display (compared to István's sharp and Reena's spectacular). István is right-handed, Reena is ambidextrous (born lefty, raised righty for courtesy's sake), and Asuka is left-handed. While István hails from the past (born in the Cold War Era, spent part of his childhood in a pocket dimension, is really seventyish but looks like a young adult) and Reena from the present, Asuka was born in the future: in the same dystopian colonial Outpost society I had previously created a trilogy for. The benefactor who constantly loads their card with money which Asuka uses to buy everything Asuka wishes... turns out to be their mother, who is also their future self from the dystopian Outpost reality, in which they are but a secondary character.
My choice of all three air signs ties these characters in as a team, while their different enneatypes lead to some really interesting chemistry: the labels of "killjoy", "angsty", and "looney" are given to these characters by one another and by others. Sometimes, they have even broken up and gone separate ways, to reunite after a while. The finale sees them, all three, running through an underground dimension inspired by Dante's Purgatorio and relying on each other's skills like never before to overcome the seven trials that lie ahead, before the final revelation...

So I mostly take cues from the enneagram and the zodiac, with a hint of ayurveda thrown in occasionally. And sometimes sort the characters into Hogwarts houses or Divergent factions (I do the same with characters in other 'verses like Westeros or Pretty Cure), to see where they could fit in. Catherine Saunier is a Gryffindor, Friedl is a Ravenclaw, and Irina a Slytherin. Étienne is a hatstall between Ravenclaw and Slytherin, and so is Astrid Aurora, while Renée is a hatstall between Ravenclaw and Gryffindor. In The Stars' Tears, Asuka is a Ravenclaw, István a Hufflepuff, and Reena (surprise!) a Slytherin. Most leads in the Ringstetten Saga are Gryffindors or Ravenclaws, but Gerhard, the founder of the dynasty, is also a Slyth (or rather a hatstall leaning on Slyth, with traits of the other two houses typically associated with the Ringstetten bloodline), with a Gryff (hatstall between all three houses as well) partner/wife in Liselotte. But what makes Gerhard a Slyth at heart, considering the bravery and cleverness he displayed at Breitenfeld? Simply the fact that the young officer puts rank/status and reputation above these values, that the first Swedish Ringstetten's choice of a military career was for winning glory and wealth, not only for excitement. Just look at Gerhard's face upon being promoted to lieutenant. And after losing every chance of a promotion to rittmeister.
As for factions: Dauntless and Amity are the most frequent ones in my works: Cath could fit in either faction, and so does Liselotte, and all three leads in The Stars' Tears.

I am particularly fond of using the Reason and Emotion archetypes from Dramatica: they provide excellent foils to one another, like a lock and key or berries and white chocolate. If said characters are an OTP, except some tension, whether for cathartic or witty effect (Gerda and Kai, or Lyanna and Rhaegar, are the first thing that comes to mind, she being the emotional and he the rational one; also Dextra and Nistro, with the gender roles inverted). If they are enemies or kismeses, expect a really interesting relationship (cold-headed Iago and hot-blooded Othello, ditto Hamlet and Laertes). This can also be a mentor-menté/e relationship, with Reason in the role of the teacher and Emotion as the disciple... especially if both learn from one another (Desdemona and the older, sensible Emilia; also Sancho+Quijote... Quijote+Sancho...). And of course they can also be literal siblings, Reason being the older dutiful and Emotion the younger prodigal (Elinor and Marianne, Elsa and Anna, Rin and Len; for sibling trios, the overlooked middle one is always the rational one: in the Baratheon dynamics, the Emotion role is split between eldest and youngest -both prodigals- Robert and Renly, middle child Stannis being the voice of reason; the same goes for the Karamazovs, Dimitri+Alyosha vs. reasonable middle brother Ivan...).
In some cases, ensembles (preferently small ensembles like couples or trios) may incarnate these archetypes: not only the cast of Othello is split right in the middle, but the second arc of the Ringstetten Saga features a similar dynamic: the final confrontation between Lost Soul Gustav Adolf and Free Spirit Katia vs. the older and bourgeois Étienne and Christina, already married reasonable authority figures (the Hera and Zeus -sans charmer instinct-, or Frigga and Odin -sans missing eye-, of the setting)... yet this arrangement is played with all over the finale: as Gustav Adolf is literally frozenhearted (after drinking from an enchanted spring, taking a 180º turn from Lost Soul to Outcast; the spring itself may be a metaphor for the still lingering war trauma within!), while his older sister Christina's concern about his change of heart -and fight against her husband in a duel- leads her to crossdress (she, the family woman and proper lady, the nurturer fulfilling gender roles, dons breeches and ties her hair in a queue!) and take up the role of Étienne's second. While Étienne approaches the duel with his usual sang-froid, Katia is only an Ophelia-style Lunatic when she crashes the gunfight -hitherto, she rolled up her sleeves as "Katharina, the German barmaid..." but the news that the duel was inevitable led her to drastic measures.
In my stories, the Emotion character is often young and female, and overlaps with the Free Spirit -again, this is the result of writing whom I know, and this refers to the person I know best of all. One who wears heart-upon-sleeve T-shirts (with quotes like PRONE TO WANDER, FANGIRL, and of course FREE SPIRIT verbatim, proudly displayed, if not Shakespeare quotes, Pink Floyd, or the Marauders' Map!). The Reason character is male and often a Lost Soul to offer a foil to her -the fish to her bicycle, the Kai to her Gerda, the left to her right, the darkness to her light-.
Nietzsche identified these archetypes of Reason and Emotion with Apollo and Dionysus, respectively. The classical myth reference cannot be more appropriate.
Anyway, what matters is that she and her foil find their rightful place: the Tin Man or Kai has his heart warmed, while the Shrew or the Beast is tamed -though not purged of her primordial nature or her self-reliance.

Reason & Emotion

Why Reason and Emotion Characters?

Even in the most Archetypal terms this conflict of "good vs. evil" is an insufficient process to fully describe an argument, for it fails to address many other basic concerns that will naturally occur in the minds of audience members, and must therefore be incorporated in the Story Mind as well. That is why there are six other Archetypal Characters. 
The first of these pairs the archetypes make up is made up of Reason and Emotion.

Reason and Emotion Described

The Reason Archetypal Character is calm, collected, and cool, perhaps even cold. It makes decisions and takes action wholly on the basis of logic. (Remember, we say wholly because we are describing an Archetypal Character. As we shall see later, Complex Characters are much more diverse and dimensional.)
The Reason character is the organized, logical type. The Emotion character who is frenetic, disorganized, and driven by feelings.
It is important to note that as in real life, Reason is not inherently better than Emotion, nor does Emotion have the edge on Reason. They just have different areas of strength and weakness which may make one more appropriate than the other in a given context.
Functionally, the Emotion Character has its heart on its sleeve; it is quick to anger, but also quick to empathize. Because it is frenetic and disorganized, however, most of its energy is uncontrolled and gets wasted by lashing out in so many directions that it ends up running in circles and getting nowhere. In contrast, the Reason Character seems to lack “humanity” and has apparently no ability to think from the heart. As a result, the Reason Character often fails to find support for its well-laid plans and ends up wasting its effort because it has unknowingly violated the personal concerns of others.
In terms of the Story Mind, Reason and Emotion describe the conflict between our purely practical conclusions and considerations of our human side. Throughout a story, the Reason and Emotion Archetypal Characters will conflict over the proper course of action and decision, illustrating the Story Mind’s deliberation between intellect and heart.
Reason acts on the basis of logic and Emotion responds from feelings. Of course, each of these Characters also has its own motivations, but seen Objectively as part of the Story Mind they represent different approaches and attitudes toward solving the problem.

Recap of Archetypal Characters

Now that we have become familiar with Archetypal characters and some of their limitations, let us recap our list of these two among the eight Archetypal Characters as a prelude to resolving the inconsistencies we saw:
  • REASON: This character makes its decisions and takes action on the basis of logic, never letting feelings get in the way of a rational course.
  • EMOTION: The Emotion character responds with its feelings without thinking, whether it is angry or kind, with disregard for practicality.

REASON

Action Characteristic: This character is very calm or controlled in its actions.
Decision Characteristic: It makes its decisions on the basis of logic, never letting emotion get in the way of a rational course.

EMOTION

Action Characteristic: The Emotional character is frenzied or uncontrolled in its actions.
Decision Characteristic: It responds with its feelings with disregard for practicality.

7. Reason

Just as his title suggests, the Reason character is present in the story to provide a voice of logic. He is:
  • Someone who is fundamentally logical.
  • Someone who makes decisions based on logic, not emotions.
  • Someone who acts in logical ways.
  • Someone whose logic influences 
  • choices, for better or worse.
  • EXAMPLES

    C-3PO in Star Wars, Hamm in Toy Story, Inspector Gordon in Batman Begins, Herod in Claudius the God

    8. Emotion

    If you’ve guessed that the Emotion character is pretty much the opposite of the Reason character, then it’s a gold star for you. The Emotion character is:
    • Someone who is fundamentally emotional.
    • Someone who makes decisions based on emotions, not logic.
    • Someone who may be negatively emotional (e.g., angry) or positively emotional (e.g., compassionate)—or both.
    • Someone who acts in emotional ways.
    • Someone whose emotion influences choices, for better or worse.
    • EXAMPLES

      Mr. Ping in Kung Fu Panda, Cathy in Wuthering Heights, Amelia Sedley in Vanity Fair, Melanie in Gone With the Wind

      Characters

      The next part of storyweaving works on figuring out where each character fits into the overall plot.
      There are eight character archetypes, two of which are:
    These basic archetypes provide contrasts to each other, and differ in their outlooks, methods, motivations, and ways of evaluating data. They can be further split up if a writer wants to create more complex characters.

    In next issues, we will talk about the Fool's Journey and how the Ringstetten Saga's first and second arcs, The Stars' Tears, and Pleasure Past and Anguish Past tie into the Major Arcana: how István, Reena, Asuka, Gerhard, Liselotte, Hedwig, Alois, Gustav Adolf, Katia, and Catherine (but also Friedl and Irina) get to close the circle of Tarot reality, from their beginnings as innocent Fools to their understanding of the whole Universe. Let me tell you: this journey is by no means a walk in the park, but rather the Voyage of Life.