Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta 100 years of solitude. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta 100 years of solitude. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, 8 de marzo de 2017

PRAISE FOR "CHANGELINGS IN MACONDO"



DAVID’s review


  • Submitted by
    Is the analysis focused on the topic proposed for the assignment (the comparison of two characters in a novel where history repeats itself)? 
    Yes. The two who are compared are not the most obvious choices but the evaluation is very original. 
    Is there enough detail and/or are there enough quotations to support the analysis? 
    The Jacob/Esau contrast is compelling and the point about coincidence in time is very acutely made. To say that the examples chosen are typical of the whole stresses their importance in and beyond themselves. 
    Does the written assignment reflect a thorough reading and understanding of the novel? 
    The foregrounding of biblical parallels which might be too readily relegated, and their apposition to modern factors of capitalism and repression completes the kind of imaginative cycle that would have driven Gabito. 
  • Daniel’s review


    Submitted by
    ¿Sus planteamientos se centran en el tema de reflexión propuesto (comparación de dos personajes en una novela en la que la historia se repite)? 
    Si, se trata la relación entre dos personajes. 
    ¿Sus planteamientos se justifican mediante detalles y/o citas de la novela? 
    Si, pero el texto se enreda en sus simbologías y lirismos de forma innecesaria y confusa. 
    ¿El texto da cuenta de una lectura rigurosa de la novela? 
    Da cuenta de una lectura atenta, sí. 

lunes, 6 de marzo de 2017

CHANGELINGS IN MACONDO

Why, why...
can we never be sure till we die
or have killed for an answer?
Why, why...
do we suffer each race to believe
that no race has been grander?
It seems because through time and space,
though names may change, each face retains the mask it wore.
Indeed. Swap the twins in the cradle, like changelings -elven child for human child and vice versa-, and you will question that nomen est omen. And you will find out that neither names nor clothes make the person.

José Arcadio II is a realistic and reflexive young man with a crippling fear of being buried alive worthy of an E.A. Poe narrator, who becomes a survivor of military repression in the rebellion he leads, and then spends his autumn years in beginning to translate the manuscripts of Melquíades; while Aureliano II is the hot-blooded, passionate twin who flaunts his fortune by using banknotes as wallpaper, and then, upon falling on hard times, spending the rest of his healthspan on a fruitless quixotic treasure hunt that he always hopes will churn something up. Significantly, both the active and the contemplative twin, both the Jacob with Esau's name and the Esau with Jacob's name, the obverse and the reverse of the same coin (which brings us to the question of what to regard as omote/ura or obverse/reverse, since these concepts, like left and right, are in the eye of the beholder...) die at EXACTLY THE SAME time and it is what happens then that closes the circle of their swapped lives.

Changelings switched twice in life: first in the cradle and not for a second time until in the grave. For a whole lifetime, they were unaware of the switch that only death can undo.

This is only one of the many circular narratives within circular narratives in the structure of 100 Years of Solitude: circles within circles within circles that constantly criss-cross one another, just like in the fabric of real life.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why, why... 
can we never be sure till we die 
or have killed for an answer? 
Why, why... 
do we suffer each race to believe 
that no race has been grander? 
It seems because through time and space, 
though names may change, each face retains the mask it wore.

En efecto. Intercambia a los gemelos en la cuna, como si fueran changelings o niños cambiados -criatura élfica por criatura humana y viceversa- y pondrás en tela de juicio que nomen est omen. Y descubrirás que ni el nombre ni el hábito hacen al monje o a la monja.
José Arcadio II es reflexivo y realista, con un miedo irracional a ser enterrado vivo digno de un narrador interno de E.A. Poe, es un superviviente a la represión militar de la revuelta que lideró y que por ende, a continuación, pasa el ocaso de su vida empezando la tarea de traducir los manuscritos de Melquíades; por otro lado, Aureliano II es el gemelo con fuego en las venas, apasionado, que muestra al mundo su fortuna empapelando las paredes con billetes de banco y, tras caer en la miseria, se dedica a una infructuosa y quijotesca caza del tesoro de la que siempre espera sacar resultados. Lo más relevante es que tanto el gemelo activo como el contemplativo, tanto el Jacob con nombre de Esaú como el Esaú con nombre de Jacob, el anverso y el reverso de la misma moneda (lo cual nos lleva a la cuestión de qué ha de considerarse el anverso y el reverso, ya que estas nociones, como las de izquierda y derecha, están en los ojos de quien mira...) mueren EXACTAMENTE EN EL MISMO INSTANTE, y es el suceso consiguiente el que cierra el círculo de sus vidas intercambiadas.
Niños cambiados dos veces en la vida: la primera vez en la cuna; la segunda no antes del sepulcro. Durante toda la duración de sus vidas paralelas, ignoraban el intercambio que sólo la muerte puede deshacer.
Esta es sólo una de las muchas narraciones circulares dentro de narraciones circulares que componen Cien años de soledad: círculos dentro de círculos dentro de círculos en constante intersección, exactamente como en la vida real.

sábado, 14 de marzo de 2015

EXCERPT FROM 100YOS

EXCERPT FROM 100YOS

Colonel Aureliano Buendía started thirty-two uprisings and lost every single one of them. He sired seventeen sons with seventeen different women, and all of his sons were exterminated, one by one, in a single night, before the eldest had reached his thirty-fifth year of age. He escaped from fourteen terrorist attacks, seventy-three ambushes, and an execution by firing squad. He survived a cup of coffee laced with enough strychnine to kill a horse. He refused to accept the Medal of Merit, which he had been offered by the President of the Republic. He reached the rank of commander-in-chief of the revolutionary ranks, with jurisdiction and command from a border to the other, and became the most dreaded man in the eyes of the Government, but he never let anyone take a photo of him.